Why the study?
Does a fixed value (12-13) on the RPE scale accurately determine the ventilatory threshold in physically active males?
Does a fixed value (12-13) on the RPE scale accurately determine the ventilatory threshold in physically active males?
A fixed RPE value of 12-13 can be used as a valid, simple method to detect exercise intensity corresponding to the ventilatory threshold in physically active males.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
RPE 12-13 may estimate ventilatory threshold in active males; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
The objective of the study was to test the possibility of using the fixed value (12-13) of the Rating of Perceived scale (RPE scale), as a valid method for determination of ventilatory threshold (VT). The sample of the subjects included 32 physically active males (age: 22.3; TV: 180.5; TM: 75.5 kg; VO2max: 57.1 mL/kg/min). During the continuous test of progressively increasing load on a treadmill, cardiorespiratory and other parameters were monitored using ECG and gas analyzer. Following the test, VT and VO2max were determined. During the test, at each level, at the scale from 6 to 20, the subjects pointed the number that suited best their currently feeling of strain. The RPE threshold was defined as constant value of 12-13. Average values of ventilatory and RPE threshold were expressed by parameters that were monitored and then compared by using t-test for dependent samples. No significant difference was found between mean values of VT and RPE threshold, when they were expressed by relevant parameters: speed, load, heart rate, absolute and relative oxygen consumption. Fixed value (12-13) of RPE scale may be used to detect the exercise intensity that corresponds to ventilatory threshold.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stojiljković et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: