September 1, 2021Journal of Clinical Exercise Physiology
COUNTERPOINT: Theoretical and Empirical Basis for Equating Heart Rate Reserve with Vo2 Reserve
Key result
This point/counterpoint review examines the theoretical and empirical evidence regarding the equivalence of percentage of heart rate reserve and oxygen consumption reserve for prescribing exercise intensity.
Design
Editorial
Authors
Discussion
Loading...
Member takes
Implication
This point/counterpoint article examines the theoretical and empirical basis for equating heart rate reserve with oxygen consumption reserve for prescribing exercise intensity.
PICO
P
Population
Cardiorespiratory fitness and exercise intensity
I
Intervention / Comparator
Percentage of heart rate reserve (%HRR) and oxygen consumption reserve (%VO2R) vs Percentage of aerobic capacity (%VO2max)
O
Primary Outcome
Equivalence of exercise intensities
This point/counterpoint article examines the theoretical and empirical basis for equating heart rate reserve with oxygen consumption reserve for prescribing exercise intensity.
Cite This Study
Swain et al. (2021) conducted a review in Cardiorespiratory fitness and exercise intensity. Percentage of heart rate reserve (%HRR) and oxygen consumption reserve (%VO2R) vs. Percentage of aerobic capacity (%VO2max) was evaluated on Equivalence of exercise intensities. This point/counterpoint review examines the theoretical and empirical evidence regarding the equivalence of percentage of heart rate reserve and oxygen consumption reserve for prescribing exercise intensity.