Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction: Evaluation of 1-year follow-up outcomes after selective neurectomy (SN) is essential to confirm sustained improvements in patient-reported, clinician-graded, and objective results. Objective: To assess outcomes of SN in synkinesis, using patient-reported outcomes (VAS), clinician-graded assessments (eFACE), and objective evaluations. Methods: Synkinesis patients who underwent SN were included in the study. Patients with less than 12 months of follow-up were excluded. Visual analog scale (VAS) was assessed as patient-reported outcomes. The Electronic Clinician-Graded Facial Function Scale (eFACE) was also assessed. Objective evaluations were carried out via Emotrics Software. Results: Fifty-six primary cases were included, with a mean patient age at surgery of 33.8 ± 11.0 years. Of these, 45 patients (80.3%) were female. The average duration between paralysis and surgery was 124.3 ± 103.3 months. The mean duration between surgery and evaluation was 19.7 ± 7.5 months (mean/SD). Preoperative and postoperative mean aggregate VAS scores were 35.5 ± 19.8 and 67.7 ± 16.5, respectively ( p < 0.001). However, two patients (3.7%) reported worsening in moving food around in the mouth, and four patients (7.5%) reported worsening in drooling. All postoperative eFACE subscores except periocular demonstrated significant improvement ( p < 0.001). Emotrics analysis demonstrated improvement in all postoperative symmetry parameters, except in the periocular region. Conclusions: SN improves patient-reported outcomes, clinician-graded assessments, and objective measurements. However, periocular outcomes remain suboptimal, and functional deficits should be carefully considered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Özüçer et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: