Key result
CME combined with practice enablers and reinforcers significantly improved general practitioners' adherence to cardiovascular guidelines compared to CME alone (OR 1.78; 95% CI 1.32-2.41).
Why the study?
Does continuing medical education with practice enablers and reinforcers improve general practitioners' adherence to cardiovascular guidelines compared to CME alone?
RCT (n=2,344)
Cluster-randomized
Yes
Does continuing medical education with practice enablers and reinforcers improve general practitioners' adherence to cardiovascular guidelines compared to CME alone?
Effect estimate: OR 1.78 (95% CI 1.32-2.41)
Adding practice enablers and reinforcers, such as nurse-led screening and prompting, to continuing medical education significantly improves primary care adherence to cardiovascular preventive guidelines.
INTRODUCTION: It was hypothesized that after a continuing medical education (CME) event, practice enablers and reinforcers addressing main clinical barriers to preventive care would be more effective in improving general practitioners' (GPs) adherence to cardiovascular guidelines than a CME event only. METHODS: A cluster-randomized trial was conducted on a convenience sample of 122 GPs who were randomly assigned to either CME only (control group) or CME with practice enablers and reinforcers (PER group). In the PER group, nurses visited GPs' offices once a month to implement the clinical intervention on patients > or = 55 years old with a scheduled visit in the month following the nurse visit: (1) screening medical records for potentially undermanaged high-risk patients; (2) prompting physicians to reassess preventive care in these patients; (3) enclosing a checklist reporting most recent information relevant to guidelines' implementation; and (4) enclosing a summary of experts' recommendations in the form of a follow-up and treatment algorithm. RESULTS: A retrospective chart audit of 2344 consenting patients, potentially undermanaged at baseline, demonstrated that the PER intervention following CME significantly improved adherence to guidelines compared to CME alone (OR: 1.78, 95% CI: 1.32-2.41). DISCUSSION: The intervention was designed for self-implementation in primary care practices that have their own nursing staff. PER GPs were highly satisfied with the intervention; the majority said that they would implement it in their practice if someone trained their nurse, thus suggesting support for development of a multiprofessional CME program to disseminate this clinical approach to primary care practice groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Laprise et al. (2009) conducted an RCT in Cardiovascular prevention (n=2,344). CME with practice enablers and reinforcers (PER) vs. CME only was evaluated on Adherence to cardiovascular guidelines (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.32-2.41). CME combined with practice enablers and reinforcers significantly improved general practitioners' adherence to cardiovascular guidelines compared to CME alone (OR 1.78; 95% CI 1.32-2.41).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: