Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of super-resolution deep learning reconstruction (SR-DLR) algorithm on the evaluations of pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET) and on the image quality of pituitary MRI compared to conventional images with zero-filling interpolation (ZIP) technique. METHODS: This retrospective study included 29 patients with PitNET who underwent pituitary MRI imaging. T2-weighted coronal images were reconstructed with SR-DLR and ZIP. Three readers assessed the images in terms of pituitary stalk deviation, noise, sharpness, depiction of PitNET, and diagnostic acceptability. A radiologist placed circular or ovoid regions of interest (ROIs) on the lateral ventricle and the tumor, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio were calculated. The radiologist also placed a linear ROI crossing the septum pellucidum perpendicularly. From the signal intensity profile along this ROI, edge rise slope (ERS) and full width at half maximum (FWHM) were calculated. RESULTS: Inter-reader agreement in the evaluations of pituitary stalk deviation in SR-DLR (0.518) tended to be superior to that in ZIP (0.405). Scores in the qualitative image analyses in SR-DLR were significantly better than those in ZIP for all evaluation items (p < 0.001). SNR and CNR in SR-DLR were significantly higher compared to ZIP (p < 0.001). Results of ERS (5433/2177 in SR-DLR/ZIP) and FWHM (0.67/1.27 mm in SR-DLR/ZIP) indicated significantly enhanced spatial resolution in SR-DLR compared to ZIP. CONCLUSION: SR-DLR tended to enhance inter-reader agreement in the evaluations of pituitary stalk deviation and significantly improved quality of pituitary MRI images compared to conventional ZIP images.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yasaka et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: