This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Using data on the investments a large number of individual investors made through a discount broker from 1991 to 1996, we find that households exhibit a strong preference for local investments. We test whether this locality bias stems from information or from simple familiarity. The average household generates an additional annualized return of 3.2% from its local holdings relative to its nonlocal holdings, suggesting that local investors can exploit local knowledge. Excess returns to investing locally are even larger among stocks not in the S&P 500 index (firms for which information asymmetries between local and nonlocal investors may be largest).
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ivković et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: