Key result
High palpitation burden in cancer patients requires tailored work-ups to identify chemotherapy-induced arrhythmias.
Why the study?
Palpitations are a frequent occurrence in cancer patients, yet they present a complex diagnostic entity with no evidence-based guidelines currently available.
This review highlights that while palpitations in cancer patients are managed similarly to the general population, these patients face a higher risk of both arrhythmogenic and non-arrhythmogenic causes requiring nuanced care.
Supports cardio-oncology integration for palpitations in cancer patients; leaves open optimal diagnostic protocols pending prospective data.
Cancer and cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are among the leading causes of death worldwide. In response to the growing population of cancer patients and survivors with CVD, the sub-specialty of cardio-oncology has been developed to better optimise their care. Palpitations are one of the most common presenting complaints seen in the emergency room or by the primary care provider or cardiologist. Palpitations are defined as a rapid pulsation or abnormally rapid or irregular beating of the heart and present a complex diagnostic entity with no evidence-based guidelines currently available. Palpitations are a frequent occurrence in people with cancer, and investigations and treatment are comparable to that in the general population although there are some nuances. Cancer patients are at a higher risk of arrhythmogenic causes of palpitations and non-arrhythmogenic causes of palpitations. This review will appraise the literature with regards to the development and management of palpitations in the cancer patient.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Essa et al. (2021) conducted a review in Cancer with palpitations. Cancer patients experience a high burden of palpitations, necessitating tailored diagnostic work-ups to identify chemotherapy-induced arrhythmias and multidisciplinary cardio-oncology management.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: