Key result
Contact-force monitoring is linked to 0% false scar detection during mapping of structurally normal hearts.
Why the study?
Inadequate tissue contact may cause bias through ventricular scar overestimation during electroanatomical mapping in patients with idiopathic right ventricular arrhythmias.
Does contact-force monitoring improve the accuracy of right ventricular voltage mapping by avoiding false scar detection in patients with idiopathic right ventricular arrhythmias?
Observational
Blinded mapping
Does contact-force monitoring improve the accuracy of right ventricular voltage mapping by avoiding false scar detection in patients with idiopathic right ventricular arrhythmias?
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 6%
Contact-force monitoring during right ventricular electroanatomical mapping significantly increases accuracy by eliminating false scar detection caused by inadequate tissue contact.
PURPOSE: Electroanatomical mapping (EAM) could increase cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) sensitivity in detecting ventricular scar. Possible bias may be scar over-estimation due to inadequate tissue contact. Aim of the study is to evaluate contact-force monitoring influence during EAM, in patients with idiopathic right ventricular arrhythmias. METHODS: including at least 3 adjacent points with signal amplitude (bipolar <0.5 mV, unipolar 3,5 mV), surrounded by low-voltage border zone. EAM were re-evaluated offline, removing points collected with contact force <5 g. Finally, contact force-corrected maps were compared to the native ones. RESULTS: An EAM was created for each patient (345 ± 85 points). After removing poor contact points, a mean of 149 ± 60 points was collected. The percentage of false scar, collected during contact force blinded mapping compared to total volume, was 6.0 ± 5.2% for bipolar scar and 7.1 ± 5.9% for unipolar scar, respectively. No EAM scar was present after poor contact points removal. Right ventricular areas analysis revealed a greater number of points with contact force < 5 g acquired in free wall, where reduced mean bipolar and unipolar voltage were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: To date this is the first work conducted on structurally normal hearts in which contact-force significantly increases EAM accuracy, avoiding "false scar" related to non-adequate contact between catheter and tissue.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sciarra et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Idiopathic right ventricular arrhythmias. Contact-force monitoring during electroanatomical mapping vs. Contact force blinded mapping was evaluated on Percentage of false scar. Contact-force monitoring during electroanatomical mapping eliminated false scar detection (from 6.0% bipolar and 7.1% unipolar false scar to 0%) in patients with structurally normal hearts.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: