A Comparison of Theories Related to Climate Justice

This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.

This paper discusses the issue of climate justice and the theories that have emerged to address it. The paper compares and contrasts the positions of two theories, utilitarianism and egalitarianism, on climate justice. Utilitarianism theory advocates for the pursuit of maximum happiness and places efficiency first. It emphasizes how to get the most benefit in the issue of greenhouse gas emissions. Egalitarianism theory, on the other hand, is based on the core value of granting everyone equal rights and treating everyone as an individual with unique values. It is reasonable that everyone has the right to emit the same amount of greenhouse gases. The paper also defines climate justice as a value system that requires all entities and individuals to be treated in the face of climate change. It is understood as a comprehensive concept that can be explained by axiology and practice. In terms of axiology, climate justice should include values such as security, equality, fairness, freedom, and efficiency. In a practical sense, climate justice should be embodied as enforceable legal norms.