Key result
Home-based remote monitoring benefits cardiac rehab when adapted to patient settings and individualized health data.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to identify the main mechanisms of home-based remote monitoring programs for cardiac rehabilitation and examine how these mechanisms vary by context.
Systematic Review (n=23)
Home-based remote monitoring for cardiac rehabilitation is well-received by patients and most effective when adaptable, individualized, and specific to CR needs.
Encourages adoption of adaptable home-based remote monitoring in cardiac rehabilitation; confirms value of individualized, patient-centered designs in systematic evidence.
PURPOSE: The objective of this report was to identify the main mechanisms of home-based remote monitoring programs for cardiac rehabilitation (RM CR) and examine how these mechanisms vary by context. METHODS: This was a systematic review using realist synthesis. To be included, articles had to be published in English between 2010 and November 2020 and contain specific data related to mechanisms of effect of programs. MEDLINE All (1946-) via Ovid, Embase (1974-) via Ovid, APA PsycINFO (1806-), CINAHL via EBSCO, Scopus databases, and gray literature were searched. RESULTS: From 13 747 citations, 91 focused on cardiac conditions, with 23 reports including patients in CR. Effective RM CR programs more successfully adapted to different patient home settings and broader lives, incorporated individualized patient health data, and had content designed specifically for patients in cardiac rehabilitation. Relatively minor but common technical issues could significantly reduce perceived benefits. Patients and families were highly receptive to the programs and viewed themselves as fortunate to receive such services. The RM CR programs could be improved via incorporating more connectivity to other patients. No clear negative effects on perceived utility or outcomes occurred by patient age, ethnicity, or sex. Overall, the programs were seen to best suit highly motivated patients and consolidated rather than harmed existing relationships with health care professionals and teams. CONCLUSIONS: Remote monitoring CR programs are perceived by patients to be beneficial and attractive. Future RM CR programs should consider adaptability to different home settings, incorporate individualized health data, and contain content specific to patient needs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clark et al. (2023) conducted a systematic review in Cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention (n=23). Home-based remote monitoring programs for cardiac rehabilitation (RM CR) was evaluated on Main mechanisms of home-based remote monitoring programs for cardiac rehabilitation and how they vary by context. Home-based remote monitoring programs for cardiac rehabilitation were perceived as beneficial, with effective programs adapting to patient home settings and incorporating individualized health data.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: