Key result
Home-based cardiac rehabilitation improves enrollment, adherence, and outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention.
Why the study?
Cardiac rehabilitation remains underutilized worldwide due to accessibility and adherence barriers with traditional hospital-based programs, prompting the need to synthesize evidence on effective home-based models after PCI.
Do home-based cardiac rehabilitation models improve enrollment and adherence to secondary prevention in adult patients with coronary heart disease after percutaneous coronary intervention?
Systematic Review
Do home-based cardiac rehabilitation models improve enrollment and adherence to secondary prevention in adult patients with coronary heart disease after percutaneous coronary intervention?
Home-based cardiac rehabilitation models utilizing digital health tools and telehealth are effective, accessible alternatives that promote high enrollment and adherence to secondary prevention among post-PCI patients.
Home-based CR models should be offered post-PCI to improve enrollment and adherence; confirms benefits of digital-supported programs in Level 1 evidence.
BACKGROUND: Although cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is an effective secondary prevention strategy, it remains underutilized worldwide. Barriers to accessibility and adherence to traditional hospital-based programs have led to the development of alternative models, such as home-based CR, to improve healthcare delivery and patient outcomes. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to map and synthesize evidence of effective home-based CR models for promoting secondary prevention in patients with coronary heart disease after percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS: Following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology, we conducted a scoping review across 7 databases: Cochrane, CINAHL, Scopus, MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science, and gray literature sources. The search included primary English-language articles published in the last decade, with an update extending to October 2024. Reviewers independently assessed eligibility, and data extraction followed the Template for Intervention Description and Replication and PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: Among the 3296 initially identified articles, 23 met the inclusion criteria. The identified home-based CR models varied in duration (6 weeks to 6 months) and used a range of technological tools, such as Internet platforms and telecommunication, for exercise supervision and patient communication. These programs include supplementary equipment and educational resources to enhance patient self-efficacy and cardiovascular disease awareness. CONCLUSIONS: All identified home-based CR models showed positive patient outcomes, with high program enrollment and adherence to secondary prevention measures. Further research is needed to compare different home-based CR models and assess their feasibility in diverse settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Almoghairi et al. (2025) conducted a systematic review in Coronary heart disease post-percutaneous coronary intervention. Home-based cardiac rehabilitation vs. Traditional hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation or usual care was evaluated on Enrollment and adherence to secondary prevention measures. Home-based cardiac rehabilitation models improved patient outcomes, enrollment, and adherence to secondary prevention in patients with coronary heart disease after percutaneous coronary intervention.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: