Why the study?
Do contemporary models of secondary prevention improve access and outcomes compared to traditional cardiac rehabilitation in patients with coronary heart disease?
Population
People with coronary heart disease (CHD)
Comparison
Contemporary models of secondary prevention vs Traditional cardiac rehabilitation
Design
Review
Authors
Loading...
Contemporary models may broaden secondary prevention access and equity in CHD; leaves open comparative effectiveness versus traditional cardiac rehabilitation.
Do contemporary models of secondary prevention improve access and outcomes compared to traditional cardiac rehabilitation in patients with coronary heart disease?
Flexible, contemporary models of cardiac rehabilitation can improve access and equity for secondary prevention in patients with coronary heart disease.
Redfern et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: