Key result
Acute knee extension raises cSBP by ~6 mmHg compared to elbow flexion.
Why the study?
Different types of exercise have varying effects on central hemodynamics, arterial stiffness, and cardiac function, but the comparative effects of acute elbow flexion versus knee extension remained to be determined.
Does acute knee extension compared to elbow flexion differentially affect vascular and hemodynamic parameters in healthy young adults?
RCT (n=35)
Randomized crossover
No
Does acute knee extension compared to elbow flexion differentially affect vascular and hemodynamic parameters in healthy young adults?
Effect estimate: Cohen's d 0.562
Absolute Event Rate: 115.51% vs 109.86%
p-value: p=<0.001
Acute lower limb strength exercise elicits a greater immediate hemodynamic and arterial stiffness response than upper limb exercise in healthy young adults.
May inform modality selection in BP-sensitive exercise; leaves open effects in clinical populations and chronic settings.
Different types of exercise, performed acutely or chronically, have different repercussions on central hemodynamics, arterial stiffness, and cardiac function. In this study, we aim to compare the effects of acute elbow flexion (EFlex) and knee extension (KExt) exercises on vascular and hemodynamic parameters and arterial stiffness indices in healthy young adults. Young adults (20 to 39 years) underwent randomized muscle strength tests to obtain 1 repetition maximum (1RM) for elbow flexion (EFlex) and knee extension (KExt). After a minimum interval of 48 h, cardiovascular parameters were assessed using Mobil-O-Graph® (Mobil-O-Graph, IEM, Germany) at three-time points: at baseline (before exercise), immediately after elbow flexion or knee extension exercises with a load corresponding to 50% of 1RM (T0) and after 15 min of rest (T15). Immediately after exercise (T0), peripheral systolic blood pressure, peripheral pulse pressure, central systolic blood pressure, and central pulse pressure were significantly higher in KExt than EFlex (Δ 3.13; Δ 3.06; Δ 5.65; Δ 5.61 mmHg, respectively). Systolic volume, cardiac output, and cardiac index were significantly higher immediately after KExt when compared with EFlex (Δ 4.2 ml; Δ 0.27 ml/min and 0.14 l/min*1/m2, respectively). The reflection coefficient and the pulse wave velocity were also significantly higher at T0 in KExt compared to EFlex ( Δ 8.59 and Δ 0.12 m/sec, respectively). Our results show differential contribution of muscle mass in vascular and hemodynamic parameters evaluated immediately after EFlex and KExt. In addition, our study showed for the first time that the reflection coefficient, an index that evaluates the magnitude of the reflected waves from the periphery, was only affected by KExt.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Santos et al. (2024) conducted an RCT in Healthy young adults (n=35). Acute knee extension (KExt) exercise vs. Acute elbow flexion (EFlex) exercise was evaluated on Central systolic blood pressure (cSBP) immediately after exercise (Cohen's d 0.562, p=<0.001). Acute knee extension exercise significantly increased central systolic blood pressure by 5.65 mmHg compared to elbow flexion exercise in healthy young men.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: