Key result
Pulmonary rehabilitation linked to ~71% improvement in FMD among convalescent COVID-19 patients.
Why the study?
Endothelial dysfunction plays a key role in COVID-19 pathogenesis, but changes in flow-mediated dilation during pulmonary rehabilitation remained to be evaluated.
Does multidisciplinary pulmonary rehabilitation improve endothelial function in convalescent COVID-19 patients?
Cohort (n=82)
Does multidisciplinary pulmonary rehabilitation improve endothelial function in convalescent COVID-19 patients?
Absolute Event Rate: 4.24% vs 2.48%
p-value: p=<0.001
Multidisciplinary pulmonary rehabilitation is associated with significant improvements in endothelial function, measured by flow-mediated dilation, in convalescent COVID-19 patients.
May support endothelial recovery with pulmonary rehabilitation post-COVID; hypothesis-generating and requires RCTs before practice change.
Background: Growing evidence points to a key role of endothelial dysfunction in the pathogenesis of COVID-19. In this study, we evaluated changes in endothelium-dependent flow-mediated dilation (FMD) in a cohort of convalescent COVID-19 patients undergoing pulmonary rehabilitation (PR). Methods: After swab test negativization, convalescent COVID-19 patients referring to a post-acute care facility for PR were consecutively screened for inclusion. Study procedures were performed at the time of hospitalization and discharge. Results: We enrolled 82 convalescent COVID-19 patients (85.4% males, mean age 60.4 years). After PR, a significant improvement in most pulmonary function tests and exercise capacity was documented. FMD changed from 2.48% ± 2.01 to 4.24% ± 2.81 (p < 0.001), corresponding to a 70.9% increase. Significantly higher changes in FMD were found in patients without a history of vascular events as compared to those with (+2.04% ± 2.30 vs. +0.61% ± 1.83, p = 0.013). Values of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1%), forced vital capacity (FVC%) and diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO%) significantly and directly correlated with FMD both at baseline and after PR. Patients with normal FEV1% (≥80% predicted) during the overall study period or those normalizing FEV1% after PR showed a more significant FMD change as compared to patients with persistently impaired FEV1% (<80% predicted) (p for trend = 0.029). This finding was confirmed in a multivariate analysis. Conclusions: Clinically evaluated endothelial function improves after PR in convalescent COVID-19 patients. A direct and persistent association between the severity of pulmonary and vascular disease can be hypothesized. Endothelial function testing may be useful in the follow-up of convalescent COVID-19 patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ambrosino et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Convalescent COVID-19 (n=82). Pulmonary rehabilitation vs. Baseline was evaluated on Endothelium-dependent flow-mediated dilation (FMD) (p=<0.001). Pulmonary rehabilitation in convalescent COVID-19 patients significantly improved endothelium-dependent flow-mediated dilation from 2.48% at baseline to 4.24% at discharge (p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: