Key result
Review of seven mathematical cardiovascular models highlights differing methodologies in portraying hypovolemic shock responses.
Why the study?
Readily finding an appropriate, easy-to-use, reliable, and ethically acceptable mathematical model of pressure-flow dynamics in the cardiocirculatory system for a specific experimental situation is challenging, and no universally valid model has been identified.
This review compares seven mathematical models of hemorrhagic shock to help researchers select appropriate models for investigating cardiovascular hemodynamics and disease states.
May aid model selection for hypovolemic shock research; leaves open clinical validation before practice impact.
Although mathematical modelling of pressure-flow dynamics in the cardiocirculatory system has a lengthy history, readily finding the appropriate model for the experimental situation at hand is often a challenge in and of itself. An ideal model would be relatively easy to use and reliable, besides being ethically acceptable. Furthermore, it would address the pathogenic features of the cardiovascular disease that one seeks to investigate. No universally valid model has been identified, even though a host of models have been developed. The object of this review is to describe several of the most relevant mathematical models of the cardiovascular system: the physiological features of circulatory dynamics are explained, and their mathematical formulations are compared. The focus is on the whole-body scale mathematical models that portray the subject's responses to hypovolemic shock. The models contained in this review differ from one another, both in the mathematical methodology adopted and in the physiological or pathological aspects described. Each model, in fact, mimics different aspects of cardiocirculatory physiology and pathophysiology to varying degrees: some of these models are geared to better understand the mechanisms of vascular hemodynamics, whereas others focus more on disease states so as to develop therapeutic standards of care or to test novel approaches. We will elucidate key issues involved in the modeling of cardiovascular system and its control by reviewing seven of these models developed to address these specific purposes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Curcio et al. (2021) conducted a review in Hemorrhagic shock. Mathematical models was evaluated. A review of seven whole-body scale mathematical models of the cardiovascular system highlights their differing methodologies and physiological focuses in portraying responses to hypovolemic shock.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: