Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To assess cumulative incidence and non-cognitive factors predicting nursing home placement in a defined older population. DESIGN AND SETTING: Six-year follow-up of a population-based cohort living west of Sydney. PARTICIPANTS: 3654 non-institutionalised residents aged 49 years or older (82.4% of those eligible) participated in baseline examinations during 1992 to 1994. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Permanent nursing home admission for long-term institutionalised aged care in New South Wales, confirmed by records of approvals by the regional Aged Care Assessment Team and subsidy payments by government. RESULTS: After excluding 384 participants who moved from the area or were lost to follow-up, 162 participants (5.0%) had been admitted to nursing homes on a permanent basis by October 1999. Of participants who died since baseline, 20% had been admitted to a nursing home before death. Of those alive, 1.6% were current nursing home residents. Six-year cumulative incidence rates for nursing home placement were 0.7%, 1.1%, 2.4%, 3.9%, 9.0%, 18.3% and 34.9% for people aged 55-59, 60-64, 65-69, 70-74, 75-79, 80-84 and 85 years or older, respectively. Non-cognitive factors at baseline predicting subsequent nursing home admission included each additional year of age (risk ratio [RR], 1.14), fair or poor compared with excellent self-rated health (RR, 2.9, 3.6), walking difficulty (RR, 3.6) and current smoking (RR, 1.9). People owning their homes had a decreased likelihood of nursing home placement (RR, 0.6). CONCLUSIONS: Incidence rates of institutional aged care doubled for each five-year interval from the age of 60 years. A range of non-cognitive factors predict nursing home placement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: