PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 7, 2018Review of Educational Research368 citations

The Effectiveness of Direct Instruction Curricula: A Meta-Analysis of a Half Century of Research

View Full Paper
JSJean StockardTWTimothy W. WoodCCCristy Coughlin

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Quantitative mixed models were used to examine literature published from 1966 through 2016 on the effectiveness of Direct Instruction. Analyses were based on 328 studies involving 413 study designs and almost 4,000 effects. Results are reported for the total set and subareas regarding reading, math, language, spelling, and multiple or other academic subjects; ability measures; affective outcomes; teacher and parent views; and single-subject designs. All of the estimated effects were positive and all were statistically significant except results from metaregressions involving affective outcomes. Characteristics of the publications, methodology, and sample were not systematically related to effect estimates. Effects showed little decline during maintenance, and effects for academic subjects were greater when students had more exposure to the programs. Estimated effects were educationally significant, moderate to large when using the traditional psychological benchmarks, and similar in magnitude to effect sizes that reflect performance gaps between more and less advantaged students.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Stockard et al. (2018) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a110b2a6f378c85fcf33731https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317751919
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper