Objective. We report a pre-registered forced-choice precognition study to test a novel collaborative platform for psi experimentation. The study compared a cohort of experienced meditators and a cohort selected merely for its interest in participating in the study. Method. The Internet-based platform, Psi@Home, was developed to allow participants to contribute at-home experimental sessions using custom software. Each session comprised 20 forced-choice trials. Eighty sessions per cohort were collected for the pre-registered study and the hypotheses for each cohort were the increase relative to MCE of: 1) the variance of session hit rates, and of 2) the total hit rate. A third hypothesis predicted a higher variance of session hit rates for the meditator cohort. Hypothesis 1 was confirmatory and the others were exploratory. Results. Only hypothesis 3 was confirmed (p = .03). However, 90 tryout sessions showed a markedly strong increase of session variance (p = .00003). Conclusion. We successfully tested a novel platform for collaborative psi experiments. Two pre-registered cohort studies found no direct evidence for a psi effect. However, for tryout data whose collection was specified in pre-registration using the same participants and protocol, variance across sessions was highly significant. Differences in participant attitudes during the two periods of data collection may account for the discrepancy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bancel et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: