Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Normative naturalism is a view about the status of epistemology and philosophy of science; it is a meta-epistemology. It maintains that epistemology can both discharge its traditional normative role and nonetheless claim a sensitivity to empirical evidence. The first sections of this essay set out the central tenets of normative naturalism, both in its epistemic and its axiological dimensions; later sections respond to criticisms of that species of naturalism from Gerald Doppelt, Jarrett Leplin and Alex Rosenberg.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Larry Laudan (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: