BERZONSKY, MICHAEL D. The Role of Familiarity in Children's Explanations of Physical Causality. CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1971, 42, 705-715. This study investigated the responses of 84 children, aged 6 years 3 months to 7 years 5 months, to questions dealing with 3 categories of physical causality and 2 causal demonstrations. The demonstrations were administered under 2 conditions-standard and an unexpected reversal phase in which results contrary to expectations occurred. The following was found: (a) Familiarity had a significant effect on children's causal reasoning (p < .01). (b) Malfunctions of objects led to significantly fewer nonnaturalistic explanations than natural functions of either familiar or remote objects (p < .01). (c) Children reverted to nonnaturalistic explanations when confronted with a reversal task in which a reasonable explanation was impossible (p < .01). The results have implications for Piaget's theory of causality and his recent explanation of divergent findings in the literature on causal reasoning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michael D. Berzonsky (1971) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: