Key result
Vortioxetine shows ambiguous effects on metabolic syndrome risk factors in depression.
Why the study?
Most antidepressants have been reported to cause metabolic syndrome, but there is a paucity of information regarding the effect of vortioxetine on metabolic syndrome risk indicators.
Does Vortioxetine affect metabolic syndrome risk indicators in adult patients with major depressive disorder?
Systematic Review
Does Vortioxetine affect metabolic syndrome risk indicators in adult patients with major depressive disorder?
Current evidence is ambiguous regarding the effect of vortioxetine on metabolic syndrome risk factors in patients with major depressive disorder.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ambiguous metabolic effects advise individualized risk assessment; leaves open definitive cardiometabolic safety data for vortioxetine.
The majority of antidepressants have been reported to cause metabolic syndrome (MetS). Paucity of information available for the effect of Vortioxetine on MetS. The study aims to assess the systematic review of Vortioxetine on depressive patients' blood pressure (BP), central obesity, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), triglycerides (TGs), and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels, which are risk factors for the MetS. PRISMA guidelines were followed in conducting this systematic review. The protocol has been registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021272614). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the effect of Vortioxetine on MetS risk indicators were searched in electronic databases. RCTs that included adult patients 18-75 years of age, Major depression patients (MDD) and prescribed with Vortioxetine drug. Preclinical research, editorials, letters, reviews, case reports, studies in pediatric populations, unpublished grey literature were excluded Abstract and title screening was performed, followed by full-text screening using the Covidence software. Data were extracted, and analysis was done using Cochrane Review Manager (RevMan v5.1). Following the screening process, 8 RCTs (6 blinded and 2 open-label) were selected for systematic review. The MetS risk factors for Vortioxetine treatment in depressed patients were ambiguous from the available research. However, 4 of 8 RCTs have shown that Vortioxetine is an effective and safe treatment for depression. All the trials were methodological of high quality. Conclusions: A single study evaluating all the five MetS risk variables in depressed patients on Vortioxetine therapy is needed before recommending Vortioxetine as a first-line or switch therapy for depression.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sankar et al. (2023) conducted a systematic review in Major depression (MDD). Vortioxetine was evaluated on Metabolic syndrome risk indicators (blood pressure, central obesity, fasting plasma glucose, triglycerides, and high-density lipoprotein levels). Vortioxetine treatment for depression showed ambiguous effects on metabolic syndrome risk factors across 8 RCTs, although 4 of the 8 trials demonstrated its overall efficacy and safety.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: