Key result
Abnormal LV GLS predicts a ~169% higher risk of incident ischaemic stroke.
Why the study?
The predictive value of reduced LVEF for ischaemic stroke is controversial and limited to severe reduction, prompting investigation of whether subclinical impairment detected by LV GLS predicts incident stroke in elderly individuals.
Does abnormal left ventricular global longitudinal strain predict incident ischaemic stroke in an elderly stroke-free cohort?
Cohort (n=708)
Does abnormal left ventricular global longitudinal strain predict incident ischaemic stroke in an elderly stroke-free cohort?
Effect estimate: HR 2.69 (95% CI 1.47-4.92)
p-value: p=0.001
Abnormal left ventricular global longitudinal strain is a strong independent predictor of incident ischaemic stroke in elderly individuals without prior stroke, suggesting a role in primary prevention strategies.
Abnormal LV GLS may aid stroke risk stratification in elderly without prior events; leaves open whether GLS-targeted prevention improves outcomes.
AIMS: Heart disease is associated with an increased risk for ischaemic stroke. However, the predictive value of reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) for stroke is controversial and only observed in patients with severe reduction. LV global longitudinal strain (LV GLS) can detect subclinical LV systolic impairment when LVEF is normal. We investigated the prognostic role of LV GLS for incident stroke in a predominantly elderly cohort. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two-dimensional echocardiography with speckle tracking was performed in the Cardiac Abnormalities and Brain Lesions (CABL) study. Among 708 stroke-free participants (mean age 71.4 ± 9.4 years, 60.9% women), abnormal LV GLS (>-14.7%: 95% percentile of the subgroup without risk factors) was detected in 133 (18.8%). During a mean follow-up of 10.8 ± 3.9 years, 47 participants (6.6%) experienced an ischaemic stroke (26 cardioembolic or cryptogenic, 21 other subtypes). The cumulative incidence of ischaemic stroke was significantly higher in participants with abnormal LV GLS than with normal LV GLS (P < 0.001). In multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis, abnormal LV GLS was associated with ischaemic stroke independently of cardiovascular risk factors including LVEF, LV mass, left atrial volume, subclinical cerebrovascular disease at baseline, and incident atrial fibrillation [hazard ratio (HR): 2.69, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.47-4.92; P = 0.001]. Abnormal LV GLS independently predicted cardioembolic or cryptogenic stroke (adjusted HR: 3.57, 95% CI: 1.51-8.43; P = 0.004) but not other subtypes. CONCLUSION: LV GLS was a strong independent predictor of ischaemic stroke in a predominantly elderly stroke-free cohort. Our findings provide insights into the brain-heart interaction and may help improve stroke primary prevention strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yoshida et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Stroke-free elderly (n=708). Abnormal LV GLS (>-14.7%) vs. Normal LV GLS was evaluated on Incident ischaemic stroke (HR 2.69, 95% CI 1.47-4.92, p=0.001). Abnormal left ventricular global longitudinal strain independently predicted incident ischaemic stroke (HR 2.69; 95% CI 1.47-4.92; P=0.001) in a predominantly elderly, stroke-free cohort.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: