Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective cohort study shows improved live birth rates in euploid blastocyst transfers using hyaluronan medium, suggesting better implantation efficiency.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether hyaluronan-enriched transfer medium is associated with improved live birth rates in biopsied euploid blastocyst transfers. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SUBJECTS: A total of 1,221 single frozen euploid blastocyst transfers performed between January 2011 and December 2024. EXPOSURE: Embryo transfer using hyaluronan-enriched transfer medium compared with standard zwitterionic-buffered transfer medium. All embryos underwent trophectoderm biopsy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Live birth rate. Secondary outcomes included biochemical pregnancy and clinical pregnancy rates. RESULTS: Hyaluronan-enriched transfer medium was associated with significantly higher live birth rates compared with standard medium (59.1% vs. 43.2%; absolute difference 15.9%, 95% confidence interval 10.3%-21.5%; relative risk 1.37, 95% confidence interval 1.22-1.54; P < 0.001). Clinical pregnancy and biochemical pregnancy rates were also significantly higher in the hyaluronan group (P < 0.001 for both comparisons). Sensitivity analysis restricted to first transfers per patient (n = 715) confirmed persistence of the live birth benefit (61.2% vs. 47.1%; absolute difference 14.1%, 95% confidence interval 6.9%-21.3%; relative risk 1.30, 95% confidence interval 1.13-1.49; P < 0.001). Maternal age was comparable between groups. CONCLUSION: Use of hyaluronan-enriched transfer medium is associated with a clinically meaningful increase in live birth rates in biopsied euploid blastocyst transfers. Zona pellucida disruption created during trophectoderm biopsy may facilitate enhanced embryo-endometrial interaction, improving implantation efficiency. However, these results should be interpreted with caution given the potential for unmeasured confounding variables and require validation in prospective randomized trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stansbury et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: