Key result
Antithrombotic stewardship programs require funded multidisciplinary services and electronic tools according to clinician consensus.
Why the study?
Antithrombotic Stewardship implementation is inconsistent, and qualitative exploration of the real-world experience is limited despite its role in minimising anticoagulant-related harm.
What do clinicians consider as core components of successful hospital-based Antithrombotic Stewardship programs?
What do clinicians consider as core components of successful hospital-based Antithrombotic Stewardship programs?
Successful Antithrombotic Stewardship requires funded, multidisciplinary, expert-led services supported by electronic tools, though there is a current lack of standardized quality indicators.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chong et al. (2026) studied Anticoagulation management (n=16). Antithrombotic Stewardship (ATS) was evaluated on Core components of successful ATS programs and quality indicators. Antithrombotic Stewardship programs require funded, multidisciplinary services and electronic tools, according to 16 clinicians across six countries who identified 19 inconsistent quality indicators.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: