Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized trial finds ctDNA can guide treatment switching in BRAF mutant melanoma, suggesting better outcomes.
Checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy (CPI) for BRAF mutant advanced melanoma first-line results in a better long-term survival compared to targeted therapy (TT), however TT induction may benefit poor prognosis groups. The parallel-arm, randomised phase II, multicentre, feasibility CAcTUS trial (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03808441) randomised 21 patients to receive standard of care investigators choice TT or CPI, switching to the alternative upon progression ( n = 10), or commencing TT and switching to CPI upon an ≥80% reduction of BRAF variant allele frequency ( VAF) in circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA; n = 11). The study achieved its primary endpoints with 100% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 94-100%) of critical results provided within 7 days to inform a decision to switch and 100% of patients commencing TT achieving an ≥80% reduction of BRAF VAF (95% CI: 80-100%). Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival and overall survival. No new safety signals were observed for TT/CPI. Post-hoc analysis of clinical features, circulating cytokines and chemokines at ctDNA nadir following TT induction suggested a more favourable profile prior to CPI initiation. Longitudinal ctDNA dynamics revealed ctDNA provided an early signal of CPI benefit and that rechallenge with TT following CPI progression resulted in a further ctDNA response. These data support the utility of ctDNA to guide treatment decision-making within a clinically relevant timeframe to optimise treatment scheduling strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: