Key result
GLP-1 use during intensive cardiac rehab shows no difference in skeletal muscle mass change.
Why the study?
Concerns exist regarding potential loss of skeletal muscle mass with GLP-1 RA-induced weight reduction, and its effects among patients in intensive cardiac rehabilitation remain incompletely characterized.
Does GLP-1 receptor agonist use reduce skeletal muscle mass in patients undergoing an intensive cardiac rehabilitation program?
Cohort (n=468)
No
Does GLP-1 receptor agonist use reduce skeletal muscle mass in patients undergoing an intensive cardiac rehabilitation program?
Effect estimate: β 0.62% (95% CI -0.62 to 1.86)
p-value: p=0.326
GLP-1 receptor agonist use during intensive cardiac rehabilitation does not lead to a significant loss of skeletal muscle mass compared to non-users, supporting their combined use.
GLP-1 RA use was not associated with muscle loss during cardiac rehab; leaves open questions for randomized confirmation on body composition.
BACKGROUND: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are widely used for type 2 diabetes and obesity and produce significant weight loss. However, concerns have emerged about potential loss of skeletal muscle mass (SMM) with pharmacologic weight reduction, particularly in older adults at risk for sarcopenia. The effects of GLP-1 RA therapy on SMM among patients participating in Intensive Cardiac Rehabilitation (ICR) remain incompletely characterized. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 468 patients enrolled in a structured Pritikin ICR program at UC San Diego Health between 2017 and 2024. At program initiation, 67 patients were taking GLP-1 RAs with a median duration of 231 days (IQR 144-400). Body composition was assessed using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) at baseline and program completion. Outcomes included SMM and fat mass (FM). Multivariable regression models adjusted for age, sex, baseline body mass index, diabetes status, and baseline fitness (measured in METs). RESULTS: Both groups improved in metabolic equivalents of task (METs) with ICR (p < 0.001). At baseline, patients on GLP-1 RAs had higher BMI and percent body fat compared with non-users, but no differences in SMM. In adjusted analyses, GLP-1 RA use was not associated with significantly different percent change in SMM from baseline to ICR program completion compared with no GLP-1 RA use (β = 0.62%, 95% CI -0.62 to 1.86; p = 0.326). Similarly, there was no significant between-group difference in percent change in fat mass (β = 3.01%, 95% CI -1.64 to 7.66; p = 0.204). CONCLUSIONS: GLP-1 receptor agonist use during intensive cardiac rehabilitation was not associated with significantly different skeletal muscles mass changes after adjustment for measured covariates. These findings support the integration of GLP-1 based pharmacotherapy with structured exercise programs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jennings et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Patients undergoing Intensive Cardiac Rehabilitation (n=468). GLP-1 Receptor Agonists vs. No GLP-1 RA use was evaluated on Percent change in skeletal muscle mass (SMM) from baseline to program completion (β 0.62%, 95% CI -0.62 to 1.86, p=0.326). GLP-1 receptor agonist use during intensive cardiac rehabilitation was not associated with a significant difference in skeletal muscle mass change (β 0.62%; 95% CI -0.62 to 1.86; p=0.326).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: