This article explores Judean identity's evolution as a theological construct during Persian rule, suggesting significant transformations across communities.
The concept of the "remnant" (שְׁאֵרִית, šĕʾērît ) emerged as a central social designation in the wake of Jerusalem's destruction in 586 b.c.e. and continued to serve as a reflection of Judean identity throughout the early Second Temple period. In this article, I explore the evolution of this term as it was applied to Judean/Yahwistic communities in various locations—survivors in the land, exiles, and returnees under Persian rule. I argue that the remnant was not a static category but a flexible theological and communal construct, shaped by shifting historical realities and imperial contexts. The Persian Empire's administrative and ideological frameworks facilitated the persistence and transformation of the remnant across geographic and political boundaries, allowing each of these communities to reimagine itself as both a restored center and a dispersed yet faithful people. This is demonstrated through biblical texts, archaeological surveys, and imperial administrative records.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tova Ganzel (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: