Key result
Emergency cholecystectomy in Grade II-III cholecystitis linked to ~122% more severe complications versus Grade I.
Why the study?
The study aimed to describe perioperative outcomes associated with emergency cholecystectomy in elderly and high-risk patients based on Tokyo Guidelines 2018.
What are the perioperative outcomes of emergency cholecystectomy in elderly and comorbid patients with Grade II-III acute cholecystitis?
Cohort (n=550)
No
What are the perioperative outcomes of emergency cholecystectomy in elderly and comorbid patients with Grade II-III acute cholecystitis?
Absolute Event Rate: 8.2% vs 3.7%
p-value: p=0.028
Emergency cholecystectomy is a feasible option with acceptable short-term outcomes and zero 30-day mortality in selected elderly or comorbid patients with Grade II-III acute cholecystitis.
Grade II-III was associated with higher severe complications after emergency cholecystectomy; leaves open prospective validation of risk stratification in elderly patients.
Purpose This study aimed to describe perioperative outcomes associated with emergency cholecystectomy (EC) in elderly/high-risk patients based on Tokyo Guidelines 2018 (TG18). Methods A single-center retrospective surgical database included 2189 patients who underwent cholecystectomy between 2005 and 2025, and the study population included 550 patients who underwent EC for AC, excluding patients with elective cholecystectomy. The patients were divided into Grade I and II-III groups by AC severity. The patient characteristics and perioperative outcomes were compared between groups, and risk factors of severe postoperative complications were assessed using logistic multivariate analysis. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to identify factors independently associated with the length of postoperative hospital stay. Results The patients with Grade I (n = 355) and those with Grade II-III (n = 195) were included. As a subgroup analysis, the Grade II-III group was divided into 2 groups: surgically low-risk patients (Low-risk, n = 82) and high-risk patients (High-risk, n = 113). The overall complication rate was approximately 15%. The rate of severe postoperative complications was 5.3%, and the 30-day mortality was zero in the entire cohort. The Grade II-III group had significantly more severe postoperative complications than the Grade I group (8.2% vs 3.7%, P = 0.028). There were no statistically significant differences in perioperative outcomes between the low-risk and high-risk groups, except for hospital stay. Multivariate analysis showed that LC (odds ratio = 0.414, P = 0.037) was associated with lower rates of severe postoperative complications. Conclusions EC may be a feasible option in selected elderly or comorbid patients with Grade II-III AC, with acceptable short-term outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harada et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Acute cholecystitis (n=550). Emergency cholecystectomy for Grade II-III acute cholecystitis vs. Grade I acute cholecystitis was evaluated on Severe postoperative complications (p=0.028). Emergency cholecystectomy in patients with Grade II-III acute cholecystitis resulted in a higher rate of severe postoperative complications compared to Grade I (8.2% vs 3.7%, P=0.028).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: