Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Measures multi-output impacts in citizen science, suggesting a new assessment approach.
Measuring the impact of citizen-science projects is hard because inputs are heterogeneous, mostly categorical, and sparse. We present Alquimics, a compact supervised neural network trained on one-hot project descriptors to predict impacts across five domains (Environment, Economy, Governance, Science, and Society). Each project is encoded as a binary vector of length 4460 (223 questions × 20 options, flattened). The network employs a 4460–42–5 topology with logistic activations throughout; labels consist of five continuous targets in [0, 1] obtained by scaling expert domain scores in [1, 42]. We implement L2-regularised training in Octave using fmincg with MaxIter = 10 and lambda = 0.07. Leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) over nine projects yields an overall RMSE = 10 and R2 = 0.06 on the 1–42 scale, with Governance being the most predictable domain (RMSE = 6, R2 = 0.3). We document the entire data pipeline, objective, and implementation, provide a minimal reproducible script, and discuss limitations arising from the small dataset (n = 9 projects). This establishes a transparent baseline that complements rule-based scoring and can be expanded as more labelled projects become available.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ceccaroni et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: