Systematic review identifies effective exoskeleton designs that reduce strain in industrial settings, suggesting ergonomic benefits.
Study aim The aim of this systematic review is to categorize and evaluate lower-limb exoskeletons, including commercial and research-based models, to identify the most effective designs for alleviating musculoskeletal strain and fatigue in industrial settings. Material and methods A comprehensive search of PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Scopus yielded 87 studies; 17 of these met the inclusion criteria (published within the last 10 years in the English language and available as a full text). Data on exoskeleton type, design, and performance outcomes were extracted. Results Passive exoskeletons, particularly “chairless chairs,” such as NOONEE and LegX, were the most effective, reducing lower-limb strain by up to 64 and 56%, respectively. Research prototypes demonstrated similar outcomes, with some achieving 83% reduction in muscle activity. Reported benefits included lower perceived discomfort, improved usability, and reduced contact pressure. Conclusion Passive lower-limb exoskeletons are a feasible and effective ergonomic intervention for tasks involving prolonged standing in industrial settings. Their portability, ease of use, and capacity to reduce muscular load make them especially suitable for widespread adoption in the workplace. Future research should evaluate long-term health, safety, and productivity outcomes in real-world industrial environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dass et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: