phrenic nerve conduction velocity in human specimens obtained at operation or from cadavers, quoting a figure of 78 m./sec. No further studies in man appear to have been made since that time; in particular no information is available on phrenic nerve conduction in vivo. Impairment of phrenic nerve conduction is usually inferred from reduced or paradoxical diaphragmatic movement seen on x-ray screening but interpretation is not always easy, especially when both halves of the diaphragm are involved. The present work arose from just such a diagnostic difficulty, when it became apparent that a more direct assessment of phrenic nerve function was needed. Previous attempts to record the electrical activity
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
J. Newsom Davis (1967) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: