Key result
Telehealth administration of the Mini-Mental State Examination demonstrated high reliability compared to in-person assessment, with identical mean total scores of 28.7 and no significant difference.
Why the study?
Does telehealth administration of the MMSE provide reliable cognitive assessment compared to in-person administration in patients with type 2 diabetes?
Observational (n=73)
Single-blind
Yes
Does telehealth administration of the MMSE provide reliable cognitive assessment compared to in-person administration in patients with type 2 diabetes?
Absolute Event Rate: 28.7% vs 28.7%
Telehealth administration of the MMSE is highly reliable and comparable to in-person assessment in patients with type 2 diabetes.
The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), a cognitive function assessment tool, was administered via telehealth with the assistance of a face-to-face collaborator. The study included 73 patients with type 2 diabetes. MMSE scores were approximately the same for both remote and in-person assessment, indicating a high correlation. Some words such as “quarter” were misunderstood by the telemedicine patient. The results indicate that telehealth for cognitive assessment by MMSE is a useful tool. The objective of this study was to determine the reliability of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) administration via telehealth with a focus on the auditory and visual test components. Reliability was assessed through use of an in-person collaborator and by assessment of faxed test copies. The MMSE was administered via telehealth with the assistance of a face-to-face collaborator. Patient responses were recorded by both the remote and in-person nurse and compared item by item; total scores for each subject were also compared. Visual items were assessed through a blinded separate scoring of a faxed copy. Percent agreement per item and total score were calculated and correlations between scores were determined by Pearson correlation coefficients. Mean score differences and associated 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Eighty percent of individual items demonstrated remote to in-person agreement of >95% and all items were >85.5% in agreement. Pearson correlation coefficients demonstrated high correlations (>0.86) between 80% of the items examined. Mean differences in scored test items were not significantly different from zero. This study demonstrates the utility of using telehealth for cognitive assessment by MMSE. It supports the use of telehealth to improve healthcare access among patients for whom distance, cost, and mobility are potential barriers to attending face-to-face clinical visits. Continued validation and reliability testing is warranted to ensure that all healthcare provided via telehealth maintains an equal quality level to that of in-person care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ciemins et al. (2009) conducted an observational in Type 2 diabetes (n=73). Telehealth administration of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) vs. In-person administration of the MMSE was evaluated on Mean MMSE score. Telehealth administration of the Mini-Mental State Examination demonstrated high reliability compared to in-person assessment, with identical mean total scores of 28.7 and no significant difference.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: