Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this paper we present various new insights on the effect intrinsic joint elasticity has on safety in pHRI. We address the fact that the intrinsic safety of elastic mechanisms has been discussed rather one sided in favor of this new designs and intend to give a more differentiated view on the problem. An important result is that intrinsic joint elasticity does not reduce the Head Injury Criterion or impact forces compared to conventional actuation with some considerable elastic behavior in the joint, if considering full scale robots. We also elaborate conditions under which intrinsically compliant actuation is potentially more dangerous than rigid one. Furthermore, we present collision detection and reaction schemes for such mechanisms and verify their effectiveness experimentally.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Haddadin et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: