Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This commentary responds to the theorization of individuals as institutions, arguing that person-institutions are an outcome of person-brands. We contend that the ontology of person-brands impedes their full institutionalization due to inherent fallibility, instability and the ongoing management required to maintain their public image. By leveraging marketing theory on the ontology of person-brands, we offer organizational scholars tools to assess what we term ‘institutional potential’ – a person’s ability to overcome the fallibility of their personhood to achieve institutionalization. Using Taylor Swift as our focal case, we demonstrate how instability, contention of values and meaning-making and non-transcendence beyond personhood challenge the taken-for-grantedness required for institutional sedimentation. Our insights lead to a research agenda that emphasizes longitudinal dynamics of person-institution formation and a broader taxonomy of person institutions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robinson et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: