Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: University students are increasingly vulnerable to psychological stress, yet there remains a paucity of validated, context-sensitive tools for rapid and scalable assessment in academic settings. This study evaluates the psychometric properties and validity of the newly developed Scale for Psychological Stress (SPS-13) in a university student population. Methods: A total of 442 students (mean age = 21.4 years; 53.8% female) from Indian universities completed the SPS-13 via a digital platform. Psychometric evaluation included internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha), exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and item-total correlations. Severity cutoffs were provisionally established using standard deviation-based stratification. Results: The SPS-13 demonstrated excellent internal consistency (α = 0.941). Conclusion: The SPS-13 is a reliable and valid instrument for screening psychological stress among university students. Its unidimensional structure, ease of digital administration, and clinical interpretability make it a promising tool for early identification and intervention. Future work will address convergent validity with standardized stress scales and explore longitudinal outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shrivastava et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: