PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 13, 2005Annals of Surgery147 citationsOpen Access

Evaluation of the Learning Curve in Ileal Pouch–Anal Anastomosis Surgery

View Full Paper
PTParis TekkisVFVictor W. FazioILIan C. Lavery

Key Result

The learning curve for ileal pouch-anal anastomosis surgery was 40 cases for stapled and 31 cases for hand-sewn anastomosis for senior staff, and 23 cases for stapled anastomosis for junior staff.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=1,965)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

What is the learning curve required to attain satisfactory training in stapled versus hand-sewn ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) surgery?

P
Population
1965 patients undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) surgery by 12 surgeons in a single center between 1983 and 2001.
I
Intervention
Stapled and hand-sewn ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) surgery (evaluation of learning curve)
O
Outcome
Ileoanal pouch failurehard clinical

The CUSUM method objectively measures the learning curve in IPAA surgery, demonstrating that proficiency requires 23 to 40 cases depending on the technique and surgeon experience level.

Abstract

In Brief Summary Background Data: We define the learning curve required to attain satisfactory training in ileal pouch–anal anastomosis (IPAA) and identify possible differences in the learning curve for stapled and hand-sewn IPAA surgery. Various studies have addressed the differences in failure rate between stapled and hand-sewn IPAA, but there is no literature that evaluates the differences in attaining satisfactory training in each of these techniques. Methods: Data were collected from 1965 patients undergoing IPAA surgery by 12 surgeons in a single center between 1983 and 2001. Using ileoanal pouch failure as the primary end point, a parametric survival model was used to adjust for case mix (patient comorbidity, preoperative diagnosis, manometric findings, and prior anal pathology). A risk-adjusted cumulative sum (CUSUM) model was used for monitoring outcomes in IPAA surgery. Results: The 5-year ileal pouch survival was 95.6% (median patient follow-up of 4.2 years; range 0–19 years). Fifty percent of trainee staff demonstrated a learning curve in IPAA surgery. Having adjusted for case mix, trainee staff undertaking stapled IPAA surgery showed an improvement in the pouch failure rate following an initial training period of 23 cases versus 40 cases for senior staff. The learning curve for hand-sewn IPAA surgery was quantified only for senior staff who attained adequate results following an initial period of 31 procedures. Conclusions: The CUSUM method was a useful tool for objectively measuring performance during the learning phase of IPAA surgery. With adequate training, supervision, and monitoring, the learning curve in IPAA surgery may be reduced even further. The study evaluates the learning profile in ileal pouch–anal anastomosis surgery using risk-adjusted cumulative sum analysis for survival data. The learning curve for senior staff was 40 cases for stapled and 31 cases for hand-sewn anastomosis. For junior staff, the learning curve was only quantified for stapled anastomosis (23 cases).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tekkis et al. (2005) conducted a cohort in Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) surgery (n=1,965). Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) surgery was evaluated on Ileoanal pouch failure. The learning curve for ileal pouch-anal anastomosis surgery was 40 cases for stapled and 31 cases for hand-sewn anastomosis for senior staff, and 23 cases for stapled anastomosis for junior staff.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a11c57bee58f06a57c907efhttps://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000152018.99541.f1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper