Key result
Elite athlete status linked to ~23 ms lower native T1 mapping times versus healthy controls.
Why the study?
Limited data indicate athletes hearts demonstrate decreased native T1, but this finding has not been replicated in large cohorts of elite athletes.
Does elite athlete status influence native T1 mapping times compared to healthy non-athletic controls?
Cross-Sectional (n=320)
Does elite athlete status influence native T1 mapping times compared to healthy non-athletic controls?
Elite athletes have significantly lower native T1 mapping times compared to healthy non-athletes, indicating that athlete- and sex-specific reference ranges should be used in cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Lower native T1 in elite athletes supports athlete- and sex-specific CMR reference ranges; leaves open outcome implications.
AIMS: Limited data indicates that athletes' hearts demonstrate decreased native T1, but this assertion has not been replicated in large cohorts of extreme phenotypes of elite athletes. Therefore, we investigated differences in native T1 between elite athletes and healthy non-athletic controls. METHODS AND RESULTS: Cross-sectional analysis comparing native T1 between elite athletes (≥16 years; ≥10 h of exercise/week) and age-matched healthy non-athletic controls. All participants underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging on a 1.5 tesla MRI machine. We included 240 elite athletes [50% women; age 28 years (25-32)] and 80 non-athlete healthy controls [50% women; age 28 years (23-39)]. Elite athletes demonstrated lower native T1 than non-athlete healthy controls (960 ± 21 ms vs. 983 ± 26 ms, P < 0.001), also when stratified by sex (male athletes vs. controls 953 ms ±19 vs. 968 ms ±16, P < 0.001; female athletes vs. controls 968 ms ±20 vs. 999 ms ±25, P < 0.001). Multivariate linear regression identified elite athlete status (β = -13.34, P < 0.001), heart rate (β = 0.6, P < 0.001), average left-ventricular wall thickness (β = -8.28, P < 0.001) and native blood pool T1 (β = 0.09, P < 0.001) as independent determinants of native T1 (adjusted R2 = 51.4%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Elite athletes have lower native T1 compared with non-athletes, both in women and men. Athlete- and sex-specific reference ranges should be applied when interpreting native T1 in athlete populations, especially in female athletes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Daems et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Elite athletes (n=320). Elite athlete status vs. Healthy non-athletic controls was evaluated on Native T1 mapping time (β -13.34, p=<0.001). Elite athlete status was associated with significantly lower native T1 mapping times compared to healthy non-athletic controls (960 vs 983 ms, P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: