Key result
Elite athletic training is linked to lower myocardial T1 values compared to sedentary controls.
Why the study?
To evaluate T1 and T2 mapping alterations and their association with sex, training volume, sports type, and standard CMR parameters in the athlete's heart.
Does elite athletic training alter myocardial T1 and T2 mapping values compared to a sedentary lifestyle?
Cross-Sectional (n=199)
Does elite athletic training alter myocardial T1 and T2 mapping values compared to a sedentary lifestyle?
Mean Difference: -0.5 (95% CI -0.84–-0.11)
p-value: p=0.011
Sex, training volume, and sport type significantly influence CMR-derived T1 and T2 values, highlighting the need for specific reference ranges to distinguish benign athletic remodeling from early pathology.
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging, utilising native T1 and T2 mapping, provides a non-invasive method for assessing myocardial tissue properties, contributing to the clinical evaluation of the athlete's heart. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate T1 and T2 mapping alterations and their association with sex, training volume, sports type, and other standard CMR parameters of the athlete's heart. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of healthy elite athletes (≥10 training hours/week) and sedentary controls (≤5 h/week) who underwent detailed cardiology screening. CMR was performed, and native T1 and T2 values were quantified. RESULTS: Of the 199 healthy participants (115 elite athletes, 24 ± 5 years, 70 % males; 84 sedentary volunteers, 26 ± 3 years, 58 % males), athletes had higher ventricular volumes, left ventricular mass (LVMi), and lower ejection fractions than volunteers. Athletes showed lower T1 values (male athletes:941 ± 23 ms vs. 960 ± 21 ms, p < 0.01; female athletes:970 ± 20 ms vs. 982 ± 25 ms, p < 0.01). T1 negatively correlated with training hours and LVMi (Rho: -0.554, p < 0.001). T1 values were positively associated with female sex with 22 ms (CI 14.3, 29.7, p < 0.001) higher values than males, while each additional hour in weekly exercise volume was associated with a 0.5 ms (CI -0.84, -0.11, p = 0.011) decrease. Compared to strength and mixed athletes, endurance athletes showed more pronounced myocardial adaptation, reflected in lower T1. CONCLUSION: Sex, training volume, and type of sport significantly influence CMR-derived T1 and T2 values. This study highlights the critical need for sex- and sport-type-specific reference ranges in assessing myocardial remodelling in athletes, facilitating the distinction between benign athletic remodelling and (early) pathological changes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Balla et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy elite athletes and sedentary controls (n=199). Elite athletic training (≥10 training hours/week) vs. Sedentary controls (≤5 h/week) was evaluated on Native T1 values (MD -0.5 ms, 95% CI -0.84 to -0.11, p=0.011).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: