The article argues that Călin Georgescu’s success in the first round of the 2024 presidential elections was a result of both economic and cultural resentment materialized in a collective will to radically punish the traditional political class. In attempting to explain the resurgence of fascism’s seduction in Romania, with the contribution of a captured and highly polarized media system, it draws parallels to the interwar period. Today’s far-right and neo-legionary “sovereigntists, ” like past ultranationalists, channelled public anxieties and resentment generated by social transformations and multiple crises into a reaction against modernity, framing democracy and liberal values as a foreign product of the West, that is imposed on and therefore threatens national(ist) identity. By updating and recirculating interwar antisemitic, anti-communist and anti-liberal myths such as that of “Judeo-Bolshevism” and “Judeo-Democracy, ” today’s neo-legionary movement that Georgescu is part of is claiming an ideological continuity with the mindset of the interwar fascist Legionary Movement. The “sovereigntist” neo-legionaries’ declared fight against “neo-Marxism, ” “globalism” and “progressivism” can therefore be read as a modernized sequel of a century-old ultranationalist ultraconservative reaction against modernity’s offspring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adina Marincea (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: