Key result
Review explores how cognitive and motor reserve influence quality of life in cardiovascular disease.
Why the study?
Evidence explicitly exploring cognitive reserve effects on quality of life in cardiovascular disease is lacking, and existing studies have not considered motor reserve.
Does cognitive and motor reserve improve quality of life in cardiovascular patients?
Does cognitive and motor reserve improve quality of life in cardiovascular patients?
This review highlights the need to explore the protective roles of both cognitive and motor reserve on the quality of life in patients with cardiovascular diseases.
Cognitive and motor reserve may influence QoL in CVD; leaves open protective effects pending prospective confirmation.
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) reflect a huge and diversified condition that influences patient quality of life (QoL) both in the physical and mental aspects, especially in older adults who often present comorbidities and may be affected by cognitive decline. The concept of cognitive reserve (CR), which is built through life course experiences, has widely been considered a protective factor against cognitive decline, while the results of QoL in the field of CVDs are still controversial. In particular, there is a lack of evidence that explicitly explores the effects of CR on the QoL in CVD cases since studies have considered only single CR proxies (e.g., education) or specific cardiovascular conditions. Moreover, none of them have considered the motor reserve (MR), another recent concept that considers the amount of physical activity carried out during a lifespan. Its potential role in preventing age-related diseases has been observed, but more clarification is needed given the importance of the physical component in CVDs. The present state-of-the-art review aims to (i) examine how the literature conceives CR and its proxies in CVDs relating to QoL and (ii) integrate the concept of MR in this framework. Implications for clinical practice will also be discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giannì et al. (2024) conducted a review in Cardiovascular diseases. Cognitive and motor reserve was evaluated on Quality of life. This state-of-the-art review examines how cognitive reserve and its proxies, along with the emerging concept of motor reserve, influence quality of life in patients with cardiovascular diseases.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: