Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
• This is likely the first scoping review of university members' health and well-being surveys. • More than 200 full-text articles were reviewed and analyzed systematically. • A classification system was developed to categorize the questionnaires. • A hierarchical model was devised to link relevant surveys to corresponding themes. Higher education institutions increasingly recognize student and staff well-being as critical to institutional success. This scoping review examines existing university health and well-being surveys to support the development of a standardized assessment framework for informed decision-making. The review follows PRISMA-ScR guidelines. The protocol was registered in the Open Science Framework. A total of 237 full-text articles were systematically reviewed and analyzed using a predefined structured framework. The review identified and detailed the key features of existing surveys, including the topics covered, the measurement instruments employed, and other methodological characteristics. A classification system was developed to categorize questionnaires, and a hierarchical model was established to link relevant surveys to corresponding themes. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first scoping review of health and well-being surveys conducted among university members. The findings provide valuable insights for improving future survey designs and advancing comprehensive well-being assessments in higher education.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Varsányi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: