Key result
The SAPHIRE tele-rehabilitation system was well accepted by patients and doctors (doctor GUI score 1.5 on a 1-4 scale), despite ECG and blood pressure measurement failures in 27% and 23% of sessions.
Observational (n=17)
A novel tele-rehabilitation system with wireless monitoring was well accepted by patients and staff, though technical reliability of some sensors requires improvement.
Supports tele-rehabilitation feasibility in cardiac care; leaves open need for sensor reliability validation before broader use.
We have developed a tele-rehabilitation application for training cardiac patients. It uses a modified ergometer bicycle with a set of wireless sensors. While the patient is exercising, the ECG, blood pressure and oxygen-saturation are monitored constantly and automatically. If sensor values exceed pre-defined thresholds, the patient receives an alarm. As a result the training will either be stopped or continued at a reduced load, depending on the severity of the alarm. To measure user acceptance, we introduced the system to 13 members of staff and four patients, who trained on the system every day during their stay in hospital. A total of 39 training sessions were completed. In 27% of the exercise sessions an ECG connection could not be established and in 23%, blood pressure measurement failed. However, there were no failures to measure oxygen saturation. The overall acceptance of the patient's graphical user interface (GUI) was excellent. The doctor's GUI with its functions received an overall score of 1.5 on a scale of 1 to 4 (usefulness 1.6, usability 1.3 and operability 1.6). The SAPHIRE tele-rehabilitation system operated properly and was well accepted by patients and doctors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Busch et al. (2009) conducted an observational in Cardiac patients (n=17). SAPHIRE tele-rehabilitation system was evaluated on User acceptance and system performance. The SAPHIRE tele-rehabilitation system was well accepted by patients and doctors (doctor GUI score 1.5 on a 1-4 scale), despite ECG and blood pressure measurement failures in 27% and 23% of sessions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: