Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The authors introduce customized conjoint analysis, which combines self-explicated preference structure measurement with full-profile conjoint analysis. The more important attributes for each respondent are identified first using the self-explicated approach. Full-profile conjoint analysis customized to the respondent's most important attributes then is administered. The conjoint utility function on the limited set of attributes then is combined with the self-explicated utility function on the full set of attributes. Surprisingly, the authors find that the self-explicated approach by itself yields a slightly (but not statistically significantly) higher predictive validity than does the combined approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Srinivasan et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: