Key result
Match referees demonstrated weak agreement with an expert panel regarding injury situations (kappa 0.22; 95% CI 0.07-0.36), showing substantially more lenient rule interpretation.
Observational (n=55)
Blinded
Effect estimate: kappa 0.22 (95% CI 0.07 to 0.36)
Stricter refereeing and rule amendments should be considered to prevent acute match injuries in elite handball, particularly during tackling episodes when an attacker is performing a jump shot.
Referees' lenient calls may heighten handball injury risk; leaves open whether stricter enforcement or rule changes would reduce them.
Although handball is a contact sport with a high risk of acute match injuries, their mechanisms have not yet been investigated. We aimed to describe the mechanisms of acute match injuries in elite male handball and evaluate referee performance in injury situations. Based on injury surveillance from the 24th Men's Handball World Championship 2015 in Qatar, injury situations and the referee decisions were identified on video footage. A total of 55 injury situations and 37 referee decisions were included for analysis. The injury situations were analyzed individually by five handball experts, followed by a consensus meeting. An expert referee panel performed individual blinded evaluation of the referee decisions, followed by an online consensus meeting. Injuries were evenly distributed among attackers (n = 29) and defenders (n = 26). The most frequent injury cause was contact trauma due to a tackle (n = 27). At the time of injury, attackers were most frequently performing a jump shot (n = 9), while defenders were completing a tackle (n = 10). Defenders most commonly tackled the throwing arm (n = 7) or toward the head/face region (n = 6) of injured attackers, while attackers most frequently hit injured defenders with the knee during jump shots (n = 5). Agreement between the referees and the expert panel was weak (kappa: 0.22, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.36), with substantially more lenient rule interpretation by the referees. Our results suggest that stricter refereeing and rule amendments should be considered to prevent acute match injuries in elite handball, especially in relation to tackling episodes when an attacker is performing a jump shot.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andersson et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Acute match injuries in elite male handball (n=55). Match referee decisions vs. Expert referee panel was evaluated on Agreement between referees and expert panel (kappa 0.22, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.36). Match referees demonstrated weak agreement with an expert panel regarding injury situations (kappa 0.22; 95% CI 0.07-0.36), showing substantially more lenient rule interpretation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: