Key result
Qualitative research approaches are necessary in sports medicine to understand the behaviors and barriers of athletes and coaches regarding the implementation of injury prevention strategies.
This editorial argues for the use of qualitative research in sports medicine to understand the behavioral barriers preventing the implementation of evidence-based injury prevention programs.
Over the past decades research within the field of sports medicine has yielded a large amount of evidence of the prevention and treatment of athletic injuries. Despite the availability of high quality evidence, compliance to interventions that protect athletes’ health is low. Consequently, evidence-based programs are not achieving their optimal effect in real-life athletic situations. Implementation and knowledge translation are the contemporary incantations to resolve this apparent gap between science and practice. This has provided us novel research questions and challenges that follow on efficacious outcomes. Most of these questions are not answered through quantifiable outcomes measures as they revolve around user behaviors. This editorial argues that if we want to know why athletes and coaches behave as they do, and what barriers there may be to changing their behavior, qualitative research can be used to give athletes and coaches a voice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Verhagen et al. (2018) conducted an editorial in Sports injury prevention. Qualitative research approaches are necessary in sports medicine to understand the behaviors and barriers of athletes and coaches regarding the implementation of injury prevention strategies.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: