Key result
Biventricular multiscale model successfully validates against displacement and strain biomarkers for cardiac digital twins.
Why the study?
A comprehensive evaluation of cardiac electromechanical models addressing both ECG and pressure-volume biomarkers at cellular, tissue, and organ levels had not been performed to build credibility for clinical applications.
A systematic framework for credibility assessment of cardiac electromechanical models based on ECG and mechanical biomarkers was developed as a foundational step towards cardiac Digital Twins.
Advances cardiac digital twin modeling; leaves open human validation before any clinical use.
State-of-the-art cardiac electromechanical modelling and simulation form the basis for recent developments in cardiac Digital Twin technologies. However, a comprehensive evaluation of electromechanical models at cellular, tissue, and organ level has yet to be performed that addresses both ECG and pressure-volume biomarkers. Such an evaluation would build credibility for applications of cardiac Digital Twins in clinical research and therapy development. We aimed to follow ASME V&V40 standards for calibration, validation, and sensitivity analysis of ventricular electromechanical models under healthy conditions, to progress towards the Digital Twin vision. We performed a multi-scaled review of ventricular electromechanics and compiled a dataset for calibration and validation incorporating ECG, pressure-volume, displacement, and strain biomarkers. When applied to a biventricular multiscale model, we achieved healthy calibrated values for the QRS duration (89 ms), QT interval (360 ms), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (51 %), peak systolic pressure (14 kPa), end diastolic (105 mL) and end systolic volumes (51 mL), peak ejection flow rate (180 mL/ms). Model validation was performed by comparison to displacement and strain biomarkers including systolic atrioventricular plane displacement (1.5 cm), systolic fibre strain (−0.18) and longitudinal strain (−0.15). Sensitivity analysis of model parameters at cellular and ventricular scales was also performed to inform model calibration and as a first step towards uncertainty quantification. We quantified the effects of variability in ionic conductance, mechanical stiffness, cross-bridge cycling dynamics, and systemic circulation on action potential and active tension dynamics at the cellular scale, and on ECG, pressure-volume, displacement, and strain biomarkers at the ventricular scale. Simulations showed that the relationship between healthy LVEF and T wave biomarkers was primarily underpinned by variability in L-type calcium channel conductance and SERCA activity through multi-scale effects. In this study, we provide a systematic framework for credibility assessment of cardiac electromechanical models based on both ECG and mechanical biomarkers, as a foundational step towards the cardiac Digital Twin vision.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied Healthy conditions. Biventricular multiscale model was evaluated on Calibration and validation of ventricular electromechanical models. A biventricular multiscale model was successfully calibrated to healthy values (e.g., QRS 89 ms, LVEF 51%) and validated against displacement and strain biomarkers for cardiac digital twins.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: