PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 1, 1984Circulation209 citationsOpen Access

Improvement in indexes of diastolic performance in patients with congestive heart failure treated with milrinone.

View Full Paper
EME. Scott MonradRMRaymond G. McKayDBDonald S. Baim

Structured PICO

Does intravenous milrinone improve indexes of left ventricular diastolic function in patients with advanced congestive heart failure?

P
Population
Patients with advanced (NYHA class III or IV) congestive heart failure (n=13 for micromanometer studies, n=9 for radionuclide ventriculographic studies)
I
Intervention
Intravenous milrinone
C
Comparator
Baseline (before milrinone administration)
O
Outcome
Indexes of left ventricular diastolic function (peak negative dP/dt, time constant of left ventricular isovolumic relaxation, left ventricular peak filling rate, volumes, and diastolic pressure-volume relationship)surrogate

Intravenous milrinone acutely improves left ventricular diastolic performance and relaxation in patients with advanced heart failure.

Abstract

To elucidate the mechanisms by which the new bipyridine inotropic agent milrinone improves cardiac function, we examined multiple indexes of left ventricular diastolic function before and after administration of milrinone to patients with advanced (NYHA class III or IV) congestive heart failure. In 13 patients left ventricular pressure measurements were made with a micromanometer to permit assessment of peak negative dP/dt and the time constant of left ventricular isovolumic relaxation, T, before and after milrinone. In nine patients radionuclide ventriculographic studies were performed during left heart catheterization, allowing calculation of left ventricular peak filling rate, volumes, and the diastolic pressure-volume relationship before and after milrinone. After intravenous administration of milrinone, peak negative dP/dt increased (+ 18%; p less than .01) and T decreased (-30%; p less than .01), while heart rate increased by only 8% (87 +/- 12 to 94 +/- 15 beats/min; p less than .01), left ventricular systolic pressure did not change, and mean aortic pressure fell by 11% (p less than .01). Left ventricular peak filling rate increased (1.2 +/- 0.6 to 1.7 +/- 0.7 end-diastolic volumes/sec; p less than or equal to .02) despite a decrease in left ventricular filling pressure (mean pulmonary wedge pressure 27 +/- 7 to 18 +/- 9 mm Hg; p less than .01). There was a fall in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (28.6 +/- 6 to 19 +/- 7 mm Hg; p less than or equal to .01), with no significant change in left ventricular end-diastolic volume. This was associated with a downward shift in the left ventricular diastolic pressure-volume relationship in most cases.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Monrad et al. (1984) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a11d09481e48c4370dce9c3https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.70.6.1030
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper