Key result
Functional Gait Assessment demonstrates strong reliability with an inter-rater ICC of ~0.94 in stroke.
Why the study?
Is the Functional Gait Assessment a reliable and valid tool for assessing gait and balance in people with stroke?
Cross-Sectional (n=93)
Is the Functional Gait Assessment a reliable and valid tool for assessing gait and balance in people with stroke?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The Functional Gait Assessment is a reliable and valid tool for evaluating gait and balance impairment in stroke survivors, with a score <20 indicating impairment.
OBJECTIVE: Walking balance is essential for daily life, especially for people recovering from a stroke. The Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) is a tool commonly used to assess walking stability and predict the risk of falls. However, its reliability and validity in community-dwelling stroke survivors were not well-studied. This study is to investigate the psychometric properties of FGA in people with stroke. METHODS: Sixty-three people with stroke and thirty healthy older adults were recruited to this cross-sectional study. FGA, Fugl-Meyer Assessment Lower Extremity (FMA-LE), Ankle Muscle Strength Test, Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Limit of Stability (LOS), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), Oxford Participation and Activities Questionnaire (Ox-PAQ), The 12-items Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) were assessed in a randomized order on day 1 and day 2. Healthy subjects only participated in the FGA assessment on day 1. RESULTS: The FGA score demonstrated excellent inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.94) and good test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.85) in people with stroke. The SEM and MDC of the FGA score were 1.81 and 5.02, respectively. Significant correlations were found between FGA and FMA-LE, ankle strength, BBS, LOS, and FAAM (p < 0.05). The Bland-Altman plots indicated a mean difference of 0.71 with 95% limit of agreement (95%LOA) ranging from - 3.60 to 5.03 for the inter-rater measurements. An optimal cut-off point of ≥ 20 was identified, with lower scores indicating greater gait and balance impairment, effectively differentiating people with stroke from healthy adults. CONCLUSION: FGA is a sensitive, reliable, and efficient tool for assessing gait and balance in people with stroke.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ng et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Stroke (n=93). Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) vs. Healthy older adults was evaluated on Inter-rater and test-retest reliability of the Functional Gait Assessment. The Functional Gait Assessment demonstrated excellent inter-rater reliability and good test-retest reliability in people with stroke.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: