Key result
3D whole-heart MRI yields superior image quality and interobserver agreement versus 2D cine in LVNC.
Why the study?
To compare 3D whole-heart MRI with isotropic submillimeter resolution with standard 2D cine MRI in measuring the bilayered myocardium in left ventricular noncompaction.
Does 3D whole-heart MRI improve image quality and measurement reliability of trabeculation in patients with left ventricular noncompaction compared to standard 2D cine MRI?
Observational (n=24)
Blinded readers
No
Does 3D whole-heart MRI improve image quality and measurement reliability of trabeculation in patients with left ventricular noncompaction compared to standard 2D cine MRI?
Absolute Event Rate: 1.4% vs 1.69%
p-value: p=<0.001
3D whole-heart MRI provides superior image quality and interobserver agreement for measuring left ventricular trabeculation compared to standard 2D cine MRI in patients with LVNC.
Purpose To compare three-dimensional (3D) whole-heart MRI with isotropic submillimeter resolution with standard two-dimensional (2D) cine MRI in measuring the bilayered myocardium in left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC). Materials and Methods Twenty-four patients with LVNC (mean age, 42 years ± 16 [SD]) were retrospectively enrolled between October 2011 and July 2020. Compacted myocardium (CM) and noncompacted myocardium (NCM) were measured in long axis (Petersen approach) and short axis (Jacquier approach) at 3D whole-heart and 2D cine MRI by two independent readers. Image quality (1 = excellent, 2 = adequate, 3 = nondiagnostic), considering discrimination between NCM and CM and CM and adjacent tissue, was evaluated. Pearson, Spearman, and intraclass correlation tests were used as statistical tests. Results In long-axis measurements, the correlation between both sequences was moderate to strong for CM (Pearson, 0.66–0.79; Spearman, 0.61–0.68) and strong to very strong for NCM (Pearson, 0.90–0.97; Spearman, 0.77–0.91). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) in 3D whole-heart MRI was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.78, 0.95) for CM and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.84, 0.97) for NCM, while ICC in 2D cine MRI was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.55, 0.89) for CM and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.72, 0.94) for NCM. Short-axis CM and NCM measurements had a strong to very strong correlation between both sequences (Pearson, 0.86–0.98; Spearman, 0.82–0.98). ICC in 3D whole-heart MRI was 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94, 0.99) for CM and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.97, 0.99) for NCM, while ICC in 2D cine MRI was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.63, 0.92) for CM and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.72, 0.94) for NCM. 3D whole-heart MRI demonstrated higher image quality than did 2D cine MRI (P < .001). Conclusion 3D whole-heart MRI revealed higher image quality, with better structure discrimination and interobserver agreement in LVNC measurements, compared with standard 2D cine images. Keywords: MR Imaging, Cardiac, Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Left Ventricular Noncompaction, Free-breathing Imaging Technique Supplemental material is available for this article.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Polacin et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC) (n=24). 3D whole-heart MRI vs. 2D cine MRI was evaluated on Overall image quality score (1=excellent, 2=adequate, 3=nondiagnostic) (p=<0.001). Three-dimensional whole-heart MRI demonstrated higher image quality (1.4 vs 1.69, P<0.001) and superior interobserver agreement compared to standard 2D cine MRI in left ventricular noncompaction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: