Key result
CIED presence linked to ~15% lower quality of life scores in young patients during COVID-19.
Why the study?
The combined effect of COVID-19 and cardiovascular implantable electronic devices on quality of life and physical activity within and between pediatric populations was unknown.
Does the presence of a CIED reduce quality of life and physical activity in children and young adults during the COVID-19 pandemic?
Cross-Sectional (n=148)
Does the presence of a CIED reduce quality of life and physical activity in children and young adults during the COVID-19 pandemic?
Absolute Event Rate: 70.8% vs 83.3%
p-value: p=<.001
Children and young adults with CIEDs experienced significantly lower quality of life and physical activity levels during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to their peers without devices.
BACKGROUND: Children with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) have a lower quality of life (QoL) compared to the general pediatric population. The combined effect of COVID-19 and CIEDs on the QoL and physical activity (PA) both within and between each population is unknown. METHODS: Individuals 8-25-year-old with and without CIED's were recruited to complete a phone survey. Data collection included demographics, the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL), and the (PAQ). PedsQL and PAQ scores range from 0-100 and 1-5, respectively, with higher scores indicating a higher QoL and PA. RESULTS: Of the 190 individuals contacted, 148 participated (CIED n = 76, non-CIED n = 72), for an 81% response rate. Participants with and without CIEDs were similar in age (15.5 vs. 16 years, p = .57), gender (male = 57% vs. 42%, p = .07), and self-identified race (white = 79% vs. 81%, p = .44). CIED participants had a lower QoL (70.8 vs. 83.3, p < .001). Lower total scores were noted in CIED participants with structural heart disease compared to those without (71.6 vs. 83.6, p = .035) and those with a history of non-CIED heart or chest surgery compared to those without (71.3 vs. 83.3, p = .035). PAQ scores were similarly lower for CIED participants (2.17 vs. 2.73, p < .001). CONCLUSION: The presence of a CIED negatively impacts the QoL and PA of the pediatric population in the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic. Further research is needed to better understand and address the drivers of decreased QoL and PA in the pediatric CIED population in the setting of the COVID-19 Pandemic.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Needleman et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) (n=148). Cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) vs. No CIED was evaluated on Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) score (p=<.001). The presence of a cardiovascular implantable electronic device was associated with lower quality of life scores (70.8 vs. 83.3, p<.001) in children and young adults during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: